top of page


All Indiana corporations are created for the general purpose of engaging in any lawful business unless the corporation specifies a more limited purpose in its articles of incorporation. In making decisions on behalf of the corporation, managers are given wide discretion in their choices. This is referred to as the business judgment rule. Indiana has adopted a strong pro-management version of this rule, which means that a manager will not be held liable for actions taken in good faith and in the exercise of honest judgment in the lawful and legitimate furtherance of corporate purposes. As stated by the Supreme Court of Indiana, this rule “includes a presumption that in making a business decision, the directors of a corporation acted on an informed basis, in good faith and in the honest belief that the action taken was in the best interests of the company.” G&N Aircraft, Inc. v. Boehm, 743 N.E.2d 227, 238 (Ind. 2001).


However, all decisions are not protected. Managers of a corporation owe certain fiduciary roles to the corporation and its shareholders, such as the general duties of loyalty and care. In other words, a manager shall not engage in activities that can be seen as self-dealing, corporate waste, or use of the corporate office to achieve personal objectives. Should a manager breach these duties and cause damage to the corporation and/or individual shareholders, the shareholders generally have two bases to challenge the manager’s actions: direct and derivative lawsuits.




Commercial. Home Improvement. Employment. Personal Injury. Insurance.

Contract Law




 General. Criminal. Personal.



Business.  Trademarks. Home Improvement. Personal.

Contract Law


Direct actions (meaning lawsuits brought by shareholders in their own name against the corporation) are typically brought by shareholders to enforce rights to vote, compel dividends, prevent oppression or fraud against minority shareholders, to inspect corporate books, or compel shareholder meetings. Derivative suits, on the other hand, refer to a more complex situation where a shareholder brings suit on behalf of and in the name of the corporation against a third party that caused harm to the corporation. Knowing which type of suit to bring, when actions may be challenged, and when actual harm has occurred is a nuanced, complex part of Indiana law. 


Not to worry. The attorneys at Podlaski LLP are here to help.


In Indiana, courts consider the best interests of the child in determining who should have custody. No presumption is given favoring either parent. The courts consider several factors, including the age of the child, the wishes of the parties involved, and the child's adjustment to home, school, and community. 


bottom of page